Editor
Learn about our
free engineering
consulting
referral
service
at:
IEEE
Consultant's
Network
of
Long Island
We
have over forty
electrical,
electronic,
mechanical and
software
engineers
with expertise in
more
than sixty-five categories
of
technology and business.
All
are members of the
IEEE and adhere
to the
IEEE professional codes
of ethics.
No
fee is charged for the
referral service.
Each
member is an
independent consultant
and negotiates his/her
own
consulting agreement.
Editor:
Jerry
Brown
Contributors:
John Dunn
Marty
Kanner
Murray
Kleiner
Dick LaRosa
David
Pinkowitz
Carl
Schwab
Gerry
Bodner
Larry
Rachman
Unless
otherwise noted,
reprinting or republication
of
anarticle on this blog is
authorized by
crediting the
author and
prominently
displaying the following
sentence
at the beginning
or end of the article,
including
the hyperlink to
IEEE Consultant's Network
of
Long Island
"This report is republished
with
permission of IEEE
Consultant's
Network of
Long Island"
John,
TI and Diodes Inc do not recommended to use capacitor 0.1uF by well known reason. The test circuitry that you copied from TI datasheet is for determining an effect of capacitance value on stability.
If somebody is not reading a datasheet, your article will not help him anyway.
Posted by: Vladimir Doubovis | November 08, 2011 at 10:56 PM
Indeed so, Vladmir. It's pretty much certin that the circuit's designer didn't read the data sheet, at least not carefully.
It's just that when the mischief was afoot and the TLV431 was in oscillation, there were several people there who were quite puzzled by the phenomenon and who didn't happen to think of the possibility that a shunt capacitance might be harmful. Hence, this caveat.
Posted by: John Dunn | November 09, 2011 at 12:15 AM
Vladimir: I don't entirely agree -- I know a lot of engineers who tend to only skim datasheets because they figure the device they're using is pretty self-explanatory and/or they've used similar devices before, but they read articles like John's blog here (or the articles in EDN or on enGenius or wherever) *specifically because they're looking for the "gotchas" that aren't obvious from a cursory pass over a data sheet*.
I would agree that with the TLV431 here, the manufacturers make it pretty darned clear that you need to be careful with the output capacitance. On the other hand, on many data sheets manufacturers seem to go to active effort to hide all the little warts of their designs! (It's also a fact these days that many engineers who only dabble a bit in the analog world don't even know what many of the data sheet specs mean...)
An interesting question is... is there a part comparable to the TLV431 that's unconditionally stable? -- That seems like it could be a significant competitive advantage to a manufacturer...
Posted by: Joel Koltner | November 09, 2011 at 12:35 PM
I would imagine all "431" devices are designed or processed differently so at the margin they may work differently.
Posted by: David Gillooly | November 09, 2011 at 01:10 PM