On occasion, I have noticed circumstances where a presentation, having been accepted by a customer or a client, may differ quite remarkably from fact. One such example came to my attention when as a teenager, I had a job as "Stage Electrician" at two summer camps , one camp for the boys and the other for the girls.
Each camp has a "social hall" with a stage, with stage lights and with a sound system that included a collection of Electro Voice 664 microphones.
The picture below is taken from http://www.coutant.org/ev664/ in which there is descriptive text for this microphone that includes the phrase "Uniform from 60 to 15,000 Hz" as descriptive of the microphone's frequency response.
Camp personnel included a husband and wife, each of them a teacher, who informed me with great emphasis and pride that these microphones were the finest high fidelity microphones ever made.
I had found a folder in the electrician's tool shed with the microphone's specifications written out and I saw the frequency response. This microphone was not designed with high fidelity in mind. It was designed for public address service. However, since the lowest and highest frequencies to which it needed to respond were of children's voices during their weekly stage shows, these microphones were very well suited indeed.
How come? These microphones were always easily accessible to campers of all ages. Now and then a microphone would get dropped or bounced to the floor from some rather significant heights. None of them were ever damaged by such mishandling.
In hindsight, I think these microphones were rugged enough to have survived use as blacksmith hammers. In summer camp service, that was a major virtue indeed.
I never corrected what seemed to have been some misinformation that was deliberately conveyed to those two teachers. Someone before my tenure had chosen well and had also made the right political move(s) in getting these microphones accepted as something that they really were not.
Presentation had overshadowed fact.
I didn't care.