It was only a week or so ago that I came across the newly-coined word ‘hypermiling’ in an automotive blog. It’s the art/science of driving your unmodified car in such a manner as to get the absolutely best fuel economy possible. Now, we all know the basic rules: avoid jack-rabbit starts, stay at 55 on the highway, and so forth. And probably most of us, especially those who are <ahem> spirited drivers, give the rules fairly short shrift. Hypermilers (www.hypermiling.com), on the other hand, push these rules to the limit.
I happen to enjoy driving. And, being an engineer, I was a bit skeptical of the claims of a recent hypermiler of getting more than 30 mpg on a coast-to-coast trip in a 3.6 liter Ford F150 pickup truck, with an EPA rating of 16/22 city/highway) (tinyurl.com/43h29bo). Now, admittedly, these folks used a bunch of techniques that definitely fall in the category of ‘don’t try this at home’, like shifting into neutral and shutting off the engine on downgrades. But it all got me wondering just how much driving technique really does affect fuel economy.
The test bed for my experiment was my 2.0 liter 2007 stick-shifting SAAB 9-3 turbo convertible. It’s got a few things going for it, such as a turbo and a manual transmission with an overdrive sixth gear. On the other hand, being a convertible, I’m lugging around 3530 pounds, even before adding a driver and passengers. Fortunately (for this experiment, not for me) I make an approximately 350 mile round-trip 80% highway, 20% local drive about once per month. And as the car has an average-reading fuel economy display, I was all set to experiment.